Warfarin Test: Who Should Pay for Personalized Medicine?


Personalized Medicine Watch by John Russell

September 9, 2008 | Payers, physicians, and the pharmaceutical industry are closely watching CMS deliberations over whether or not to pay for a genetic-based test that provides guidance on Warfarin dosing. The FDA, which approved the test, says it’s an important tool, but the CMS isn’t so sure and opened a National Coverage Analysis (NCA) on the subject in August.

This is an important first test for personalized medicine (PM). Achieving the right dosing for the anticoagulant Warfarin is notoriously tricky. Something like half a million patients begin taking Warfarin each year and adverse affects (bleeding) are not uncommon. The test in question determines a patient’s haplotype for CYP2C, a key protein in Warfarin metabolism.

A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine earlier this year (link to abstract below) suggested genotyping for a different protein, VKORC1, was actually a better indicator and cast doubt on the CYP2C test. In any case, the initial deadline for public comment to NCA passed last week, and observers are now anxiously awaiting CMS’ decision, which will have a significant affect on patient access to these PM tests.

These are early days for personalized medicine and clearly many significant science and funding questions will arise, such as those surround the Warfarin genotyping test. Stay tuned.

Related Links:

Genetic Determinants of Response to Warfarin during Initial Anticoagulation, NEJM

NCA Tracking Sheet for Pharmacogenomic Testing for Warfarin Response (CAG-00400N)

Warfarin DNA Testing Reimbursement Public Comment DEADLINE Wednesday 9/3/08

Click here to log in.

0 Comments

Add Comment

Text Only 2000 character limit

Page 1 of 1

White Papers & Special Reports

Digital End-To-End for Pharma
Sponsored by SAIC

Given the rapidly changing pharmaceutical industry landscape, traditional methods alone of identifying, retrieving, and analyzing the private and publicly available information no longer suffice. How can Pharma effectively harness the immense amounts of data from an ever-growing number of internal and external sources?

The Digital End-to-End white paper discusses some of the ways that Pharma can harness the power of the data to pursue novel products that are profitable, safe, and have proven value to one or more patient populations.



Adobe® LiveCycle® ES
Deploying Adobe Technology to Automate Electronic Submissions
Sponsored by Adobe
Discover how to:
  • Help reduce the cost of bringing products to market
  • Improve document collaboration across your organization
  • Satisfy global regulatory requirements, stockholder expectations, and customer demands
  • Improve data capture, information assurance, document output, process management, and content services
  • Gain a competitive advantage, get immediate ROI


Interoperability and Architecture for the Life Sciences Industry
What it will take to gain industry consensus on interchange standards, and what organizations can do today to optimize their own information architectures
Sponsored by SAS
Information technology is finally up to the task of cost-effective clinical research. But there are still some significant barriers to gaining all the benefits of this technology, in particular, interoperability. This white paper explores the need for a consistent industry architecture that allows life sciences firms to connect their enterprises and benefit from unified data integration, process consistency and rapid communication of meaningful drug findings.


Life Science Webcasts & Podcasts

Medidata Solutions

Rising Clinical Trial Delays and Costs - Addressing the Cause, Not the Symptoms

Protocol complexity is taking a toll on clinical study speed and efficiency: increasingly complicated and ambitious protocols are not only burdening sites and study volunteers but are also prolonging trials and increasing expenses. In response, sponsors have turned to global study placement, restructured site relationships and new site management practices, but the problem remains.

This podcast will discuss:

  • Why these responses address only the symptoms, not the underlying cause, of rising clinical trial delays and costs.
  • Results of a recent joint Tufts University / Medidata Solutions study.
  • New metrics benchmarking protocol design trends.
  • Systematic protocol design improvements and why they are essential to clinical trial performance excellence.

Speakers: Ken Getz, Senior Research Fellow at the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, and Ed Seguine, General Manager, Trial Planning Solutions at Medidata.

Download Now



More Podcasts

Job Openings

Manager, Scientific Computing & Programming
Lead SAIC-Frederick, Inc.’s Bioinformatics & Analysis Group in developing & maintaining informatics pipelines for generation/analysis of dense genotyping & next-generation sequencing data. Required: MS or equiv. 5 yrs related experience. Knowledge of programming/software development, high performance computing, bioinformatics, project management. Visit www.saic-frederick.com - #130019.

Related Resources & Products

Biomarkers in Clinical Development: Implications for Personalized Medicine and Streamlining R&D
Biomarkers in Clinical Development: Implications for Personalized Medicine and Streamlining R&D;
Translational Cancer Medicine
New Directions for Personalized Medicine



For reprints and/or copyright permission, please contact The YGS Group, 1808 Colonial Village Lane, Lancaster, PA;

(717) 399-1900 ext. 125, or via email to [email protected].